III Münsterberg in 1898 , Not Allport in 1937 , Introduced the Terms ‘ Idiographic ’ and ‘ Nomothetic ’ to American Psychology

نویسنده

  • Terry J. Knapp
چکیده

Psychologists use the term ‘idiographic’ to refer to the characteristics of unique individuals and ‘nomothetic’ to refer to universal characteristics. It is widely accepted that Gordon Allport borrowed those terms from the German philosopher Wilhelm Windelband and introduced the idiographic/nomothetic distinction to American psychology. However, in this paper we argue that the terms were made a part of American psychological discourse at least as early as 1898 by Hugo Münsterberg, two generations before Allport, and were incorporated by William Stern, who had a strong influence on Allport. Recognizing Münsterberg’s and Stern’s contribution assists in a more secure interpretation of Allport’s understanding of the importance of a balance between idiographic and nomothetic approaches.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Person as a Focus for Research – The Contributions of Windelband, Stern, Allport, Lamiell, and Magnusson

At the end of the 19 century, Wilhelm Windelband proposed a distinction between nomothetic and idiographic research, which became highly relevant for the discussion of the nature of psychological science. During the 20 th century, a number of writers (including William Stern, Gordon Allport, James Lamiell and David Magnusson) have criticized the focus on variables rather than persons, and popul...

متن کامل

Nomothetic Psychoanalysis

Psychoanalytic theory’s roots (in the clinic rather than the laboratory), and aims (depth understanding of the individual) have led to the development of a theoretical perspective that relies primarily on idiographic data and case material to derive and test psychoanalytic hypotheses. In this article, I describe nomothetic psychoanalysis–a framework for conceptualizing and evaluating psychoanal...

متن کامل

Personality: Nomothetic or Idiographic? A Response to Kenrick and Stringfield

It is suggested, contrary to the interpretation presented by Kenrick and Stringfield, that substantial consistency can be observed in personality as reflected in both behavior and judges' ratings when the principle of aggregation is applied to traditional nomothetic assessment procedures and results are interpreted in terms of classical reliability theory. Moreover, it is demonstrated that conc...

متن کامل

Bridging the idiographic-nomothetic divide: a follow-up study.

In a replication and extension of Grice (2004), participants in the current study rated themselves and other known individuals on scales constructed from their own personal constructs and on marker items for the Big Five model personality traits. Confirmatory components analyses revealed excellent fit for the Big Five Model when applied to aggregate trait ratings but highly variable fit when ap...

متن کامل

Experience Sampling Methods: A Modern Idiographic Approach to Personality Research.

Experience sampling methods are essential tools for building a modern idiographic approach to understanding personality. These methods yield multiple snapshots of people's experiences over time in daily life and allow researchers to identify patterns of behavior within a given individual, rather than strictly identify patterns of behavior across individuals, as with standard nomothetic approach...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006